Drawing for SNAILS

USPTO serial 85433920

SNAILS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SNAILS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Becker

JEFFREY M. BECKER HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP2323 VICTORY AVE STE 700DALLAS, TX 75219-7673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyeglass framesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 24, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 29, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 31, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 8, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance