Drawing for FRESH 'N READY TO GO

USPTO serial 85433922

FRESH 'N READY TO GO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH 'N READY TO GO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian E. Turung,

BRIAN E. TURUNG, FAY SHARPE, LLP1228 EUCLID AVENUE5TH FL, HALLE BLDGCLEVELAND, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Handheld snack food items consisting primarily of meat wrapped in dough; handheld snack food items consisting primarily of poultry wrapped in dough; handheld snack food items consisting primarily of vegetables wrapped in doughACTIVE—
030Handheld snack food items consisting primarily of cheese wrapped in doughACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 18, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 11, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance