USPTO serial 85434426
HYBRITIVITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYBRITIVITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron Shechet, Esq.
AARON SHECHET, ESQ. CHANDLER & SHECHET, LLP1844 BAGLEY AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90035-4111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms for social networking and social introduction; electronic transmission of instant messages and data; providing online forums, chat rooms, and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users on topics of general interest; providing online forums, chat rooms, and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users on topics of rankings, ratings, reviews, referrals, and recommendations relating to activity planning, project collaboration and management, and employment; telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of data, messages, and information; providing online communications links which transfer web site users to other local and global web pages; Transmission of invitations, data, documents, electronic mail, calendars, announcements, photographs and greetings via an electronic communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to form virtual communities; Providing a web site that gives computer users the ability to upload, exchange and share photos, videos and video logs; Peer-to-browser photo sharing services, namely, providing a website featuring technology enabling users to upload, view, and download digital photos | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Internet-based social introduction and social networking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Graham Hope
- Other trademarks owned by Graham Hope
- Other trademarks owned by PROGRAM MEDIA, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named HYBRITIVITY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |