Drawing for WHEN IN DOUBT, CHECK THEM OUT.

USPTO serial 85434636

WHEN IN DOUBT, CHECK THEM OUT.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHEN IN DOUBT, CHECK THEM OUT.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kari B. Frank

KARI B. FRANK DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S 6TH ST STE 1500MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1553UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Medical and Health Care Services, Namely, Clinical Medical and Health Care Services, Hospital Services, Physician Services, Nursing Services, and Medical Testing Services in the Field of Concussion Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management; Providing Health and Medical Information in the Field of Concussion Diagnosis, Treatment, and ManagementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 7, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 7, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 24, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 17, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance