Drawing for HOOPLA

USPTO serial 85434779

HOOPLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOOPLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Dergosits

MICHAEL E. DERGOSITS DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP3 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 410SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing a website featuring a media aggregator for internet news contentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 20, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 8, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 9, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 10, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 9, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 9, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 9, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 17, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 27, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance