CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for COATS FUSION

USPTO serial 85435104

COATS FUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COATS FUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian M. Davis

BRIAN M. DAVIS VLP LAW GROUP LLP5960 FAIRVIEW RD STE 400CHARLOTTE, NC 28210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
023Yarns and threads for knitting, sewing and crochetingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 30, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 28, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 29, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 20, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 20, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 17, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 17, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 17, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 17, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 17, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance