Drawing for RECEIVABLES360 INSURANCE

USPTO serial 85435414

RECEIVABLES360 INSURANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, KATHERINE S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RECEIVABLES360 INSURANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph J. Jochman

JOSEPH J. JOCHMAN ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL, LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Services, namely, installation of computer software and updates and revisions thereof offered to insurance companies for processing financial transactions, namely, for providing remittance, remote capture and enterprise content management of business to consumer payments; services, namely, technical support services in the nature of troubleshooting of computer software problems rendered to users of its computer software offered to insurance companies for processing financial transactions, namely, for providing remittance, remote capture and enterprise content management of business to consumer paymentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 12, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 21, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 22, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED—
May 22, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED—
May 22, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
May 22, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 18, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance