USPTO serial 85435688
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Burlington, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S. EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Synthetic resins for use in manufactured articles; manufactured articles, namely dust palliatives, namely chemical preparations for stabilizing dust; adhesives for use in industry; binders for wood composites and other natural fiber systems composed of agricultural crops and/or wood derived fibers | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Manufactured articles, namely, paints and industrial, maintenance and specialty coatings; coatings utilized to cover concrete applications in either a decorative or protective fashion; printing inks and toners | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Manufactured articles, namely, paper and paperboard, adhesives for stationery or household purposes, adhesive labels, adhesive tapes for stationery or household purposes, ink stamps, adhesive plastic film for household use, adhesive plastic film for industrial and commercial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Manufactured articles, namely, sealants for buildings, weatherstripping sealants in the nature of caulks, building insulation | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Manufactured articles, namely, non-metal shingles for roofing and composite panels consisting of a rigid expanded polystyrene core bonded to an outer skin of MDF (medium-density fiberboard) wood sheet and building materials namely particle boards, non-metal decking, and non-metal fencing | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Manufactured articles, namely, wood composite panels, wood particleboard and wood fiberboard for use in further manufacturing; and composite panels, particleboard and fiberboard composed of natural fibre systems composed of agricultural crops and/or wood derived fibres for use in further manufacturing | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Manufactured articles, namely, carpets, carpet backing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product research and development services for others; research and development services for others in the fields of chemistry and green chemistry | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |