Drawing for CLEAN MD

USPTO serial 85436593

CLEAN MD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAN MD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Lauson

ROBERT LAUSON LAUSON AND TARVER880 APOLLO ST STE 301EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-4782UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated liquid cosmetics that improve the appearance of your skinACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 13, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 12, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 20, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 26, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance