USPTO serial 85437011
EGGUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EGGUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Stewart
JOSEPH A. STEWART KOBAYASHI, SUGITA & GODA999 BISHOP ST STE 2600HONOLULU, HI 96813-4430UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for video and computer games; Computer software for controlling the operation of audio and video devices; Computer software for use in the safeguarding of digital files, including audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files; Digital audio and video recorders and players | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2009 |
| 038 | Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to films and television programmes provided via a video-on-demand service; Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video and audio content provided via a video-on-demand service via the Internet; Electronic transmission of voice, data and images by television and video broadcasting; Interactive delivery of video over digital networks; Peer-to-peer network computer services, namely, electronic transmission of audio, video and other data and documents among computers; Providing co-location services for voice, video and data communications applications; Streaming of video material on the Internet; Video broadcasting; Video broadcasting and transmission services via the Internet, featuring films and movies; Video broadcasting services via the Internet; Video on demand transmissions; Video streaming services via the Internet, featuring independent films and movies; Video transmission over digital networks; Video-on-demand transmission services; Video-on-demand transmission services via the Internet | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |