USPTO serial 85437862
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
GEORGE W. LEWIS WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN, LL1250 CONNECTICUT AVE., NWSUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication access services; mobile phone telecommunication services; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of voice, data, graphics, message, images, audio and video by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the internet; telecommunication services, namely, voice mails and electronic messaging service; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of electronic data and messaging including text messages, images messages, postcard and group messages to mobile communications devices; providing remote access to the internet for running web site searches; telecommunication services, namely, transmission of secure electronic data, sound, images or and messages; providing user access to the internet; providing telecommunications connection to the internet or databases; providing on-line chat rooms for social networking; provision of on-line forums for the transmission of photos or images; provision of on-line forums for the transmission of messages between users of social networking; electronic transmission of instant messages and data; streaming of audio, visual and audiovisual material via a global computer network; video streaming services via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Digital imaging services; electronic desktop publishing; entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games, providing single payer and multi-player knowledge test competitions via online to user of mobile communications devices; on-line publication of electronic books, namely, electronic books and journals on a variety of subjects; entertainment services, namely, providing information, news and blogs on variety of subjects in the fields of education and entertainment; production of music and films; entertainment services, namely, organization of contests; educational services, namely, organization of online contest; entertainment services, namely, organization of competitions to vote and comment on the photos or images of other social network users | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of telecommunications apparatus and equipment; computer software design; installation, maintenance and updating of computer software; conversion of data and documents from physical to electronic media; data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; installing digital software applications for computer games, music and films to multimedia, computer, communication and telecommunication devices; installing computer programs; installing digital application software applications for computer games, music and films to mobile phones and multimedia devices; providing search engines for the internet; design and development of software for internet portals, chat rooms, chat lines and internet forums; computer services, namely, hosting online web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings, and interactive discussions; computer services in the nature of customized webpages featuring user-defined information and user-defined personal profiles, and such webpages allow users to upload, exchange and share photos and videos featuring news, sports and entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 7, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |