Drawing for MAKE TODAY LEGENDARY

USPTO serial 85438649

MAKE TODAY LEGENDARY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAKE TODAY LEGENDARY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirtsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 15, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 15, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 25, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 25, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance