USPTO serial 85438674
VERDECONTROLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERDECONTROLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy H. Hiebert
TIMOTHY H. HIEBERT SAMUELS & HIEBERT LLC2 INTERNATIONAL PL FL 23BOSTON, MA 02110-4104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus that employs light concentrating optics to concentrate sunlight and to aid in the conversion of sunlight into electric and thermal energy; Circuit boards; Circuit breaker panel boards; Computer application software for mobile phones and handheld computers, namely, software for transmitting information about energy usage and equipment and for controlling and monitoring the status of energy equipment; Computer software for transmitting information about energy usage and equipment and for controlling and monitoring the status of energy equipment; Computer software for facilities management, namely software for monitoring and controlling building environment and security systems; Converters; Digital signal processors; Distribution boxes for electrical power; Electric connectors; Electric control devices for heating and energy management; Electric meters; Electrical connector housings; Electrical controllers; Electrical controls for irrigation sprinkler systems; Electrical integrated control systems for use in the field of renewable energy, power generation and heating systems; Electrical power distribution units; Electrical switches; Electronic devices, namely, energy meters for tracking and monitoring energy usage; Gas meters; Photovoltaic solar modules for production of electricity; Photovoltaic systems that convert sunlight into electric and thermal energy; Power inverters; Solar panels for production of electricity; Temperature sensors; Temperature transmitters; Transmitters of electronic signals; Turbine control systems comprising electronic sensors and related software; Water meters; Wind turbine controller | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2014 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |