USPTO serial 85438685
ELIZABETHSTREET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELIZABETHSTREET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
Worldwide Digital Media Corporation
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Worldwide Digital Media Corporation
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PUBLICATION PAPER, PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BROCHURES, BOOKLETS, PRINTED TEACHING MATERIALS, BOOKS, HAND-OUTS, WORKBOOKS AND QUICK REFERENCE POCKET GUIDES IN THE FIELDS OF FASHION, EDUCATION, NEWS STORIES, CURRENT EVENTS, RECREATION AND LEISURE ACTIVITIES, AND ENTERTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING AN INTERNET WEBSITE PORTAL IN THE FIELDS OF ENTERTAINMENT, CULTURAL EVENTS, BOOKS, CULTURAL ACTIVITIES, FASHION EVENTS FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES, AND DIGITAL VIDEO, AUDIO, AND MULTIMEDIA PUBLISHING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC DESKTOP PUBLISHING, ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING SERVICES, NAMELY, PUBLICATION OF TEXT AND GRAPHIC WORKS OF OTHERS ON CD, DVD, ON-LINE FEATURING FASHION; OPEN-ACCESS PUBLISHING SERVICES, NAMELY, PUBLICATION OF ELECTRONIC GUIDES ON FASHION, ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATION; PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO PUBLISHING OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO MULTIMEDIA PUBLISHING, PUBLISHING OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS AND PUBLISHING OF WEB MAGAZINES; ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEBSITE THAT DISPLAYS VARIOUS REQUESTS, REVIEWS, RECOMMENDATIONS, RANKINGS, TRACKINGS, VOTES, AND INFORMATION RELATING TO UNCREATED, UNRELEASED, NEW, SPECIAL, POPULAR, AND RARE PRODUCTS, SERVICES, AND EVENTS IN THE FIELDS OF POP CULTURE, ENTERTAINMENT, EDUCATION AND SPORTS, ALL EXCLUSIVELY FOR NON-BUSINESS AND NON-COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND PURPOSES; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF DEVELOPMENT, CREATION, PRODUCTION AND POST-PRODUCTION SERVICES OF MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN THE FIELDS OF CELEBRITIES, ENTERTAINMENT, AND POPULAR CULTURE; PROVIDING A WEBSITE AT WHICH THE GENERAL PUBLIC CAN RECEIVE ADVICE CONCERNING HAPPINESS FROM AN INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY, SUCH ADVICE BEING FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES, STORYTELLING; PROVIDING INFORMATION, NEWS AND COMMENTARY IN THE FIELDS OF ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATION, PROVIDING ONLINE INTERVIEWS OF CELEBRITIES, ATHLETES, MOTHERS AND WORKING WOMEN IN THE FIELDS OF STYLE, FASHION AND EDUCATION FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATION PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEDIABEND CAPITAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Worldwide Digital Media Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ELIZABETH STREET MEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ELIZABETH STREET MEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ELIZABETHSTREET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2013 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 10, 2013 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 10, 2013 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |