USPTO serial 85438716
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Bingham Farms, MI
Bingham Farms, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hope V. Shovein
HOPE V. SHOVEIN BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CTR FL 22SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1183UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR SECURITY SYSTEMS, FIRE ALARMS, ALARM CENTRAL UNITS, ANTI-INTRUSION ALARMS, BURGLAR ALARMS, PERSONAL HEALTH AND SECURITY ALARMS, SMOKE AND GAS ALARMS, RESIDENTIAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, LIGHTING CONTROLS, RESIDENTIAL AUTOMATION DEVICES, SPRINKLER SYSTEMS FOR FIRE PROTECTION, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SERVICES; TECHNOLOGY CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF INTEGRATION OF HOME AUTOMATION SYSTEMS WITH COMPUTER NETWORKS AND MONITORING SYSTEMS; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO OPERATE, MANAGE AND MONITOR SECURITY SYSTEMS, FIRE ALARMS, ALARM CENTRAL UNITS, ANTI-INTRUSION ALARMS, BURGLAR ALARMS, PERSONAL HEALTH AND SECURITY ALARMS, SMOKE AND GAS ALARMS, RESIDENTIAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, LIGHTING CONTROLS AND RESIDENTIAL AUTOMATION DEVICES; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO MONITOR AND TRACK HUMAN MOVEMENT ACTIVITY IN HOMES AND BUILDINGS, HEALTH CONDITIONS IN HOMES AND BUILDINGS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, AND USED TO TRANSMIT ELECTRONIC MESSAGES AND DATA VIA COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; WEATHER INFORMATION SERVICES; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING IN THE NATURE OF REPAIR OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING IN THE NATURE OF DIAGNOSING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER PERIPHERAL AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | ELECTRONIC MONITORING SERVICES FOR SECURITY PURPOSES OF ALARMS AND SECURITY SYSTEMS; ALARM RESPONSE AND VERIFICATION SERVICES; MONITORING OF ALARMS, SECURITY SYSTEMS AND RESIDENTIAL AUTOMATION SYSTEMS FOR SECURITY PURPOSES; REMOTE MONITORING OF ALARMS, SECURITY SYSTEMS AND RESIDENTIAL AUTOMATION SYSTEMS FOR SECURITY PURPOSES; MONITORING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR SECURITY PURPOSES, NAMELY, REMOTE MONITORING OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS IN THE FIELDS OF SECURITY SYSTEMS, FIRE ALARMS, ALARM CENTRAL UNITS, ANTI-INTRUSION ALARMS, BURGLAR ALARMS, PERSONAL HEALTH AND SECURITY ALARMS, SMOKE AND GAS ALARMS, RESIDENTIAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, LIGHTING CONTROLS, RESIDENTIAL AUTOMATION DEVICES, SPRINKLER SYSTEMS FOR FIRE PROTECTION; FIRE ALARM SPRINKLER AND WATER FLOW MONITORING SERVICES FOR FIRE ALARM SECURITY PURPOSES; CONTROL OF BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL ACCESS AND SECURITY SYSTEMS; MONITORING TELEPHONE CALLS FROM SUBSCRIBERS AND NOTIFYING EMERGENCY FACILITIES; ELECTRONIC MONITORING SERVICES FOR SECURITY PURPOSES IN THE FIELD OF PETS, HOMES, PEOPLE AND BUSINESS BUILDINGS; PROVIDING SECURITY CONSULTING AND SECURITY CONSULTING VIA TELEPHONE HOTLINE; MONITORING TELEPHONE CALLS AND MESSAGES FROM SUBSCRIBERS AND NOTIFYING EMERGENCY FACILITIES FROM CALL CENTERS IN THE FIELDS OF SECURITY SYSTEMS, FIRE ALARMS, ALARM CENTRAL UNITS, ANTI-INTRUSION ALARMS, BURGLAR ALARMS, PERSONAL HEALTH AND SECURITY ALARMS, SMOKE AND GAS ALARMS, RESIDENTIAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS, LIGHTING CONTROLS, RESIDENTIAL AUTOMATION DEVICES AND SPRINKLER SYSTEMS FOR FIRE PROTECTION | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |