USPTO serial 85439219
HOTEL CALIFORNIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOTEL CALIFORNIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Seiter
William J. Seiter Seiter Legal Studio2500 Broadway, Bldg F, Suite F-125Santa Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrances, perfumes, eau de toilette, essential oils for personal use, perfume oils; toiletries and cosmetics, namely, shower gel, facial washes, facial scrubs, face creams, eye cream, hair gel, bath soaps in solid form, shaving cream, shaving gel, shaving preparations, shaving balm, after-shave; body and beauty care cosmetics and toiletries, namely, soaps for body care, liquid soaps for hands, face and body, facial cleansers, skin toners, skin cleansers and emollients, cleansing creams, body scrub, facial scrub, skin lotions, skin cleansing lotions, face lotions, body lotions, skin moisturizers, cosmetic creams for skin care, nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes, body oil, bath oil, lip balm, dentifrices, toothpaste, non-medical mouthwash and gargle, bath gel, shampoos, hair conditioners, hair care preparations, hair styling gels, hair lotions, hair styling preparations, deodorants for body care, body powder, anti-perspirants, cosmetic suntan lotions, sun-protecting and sun-tanning preparations, cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Backpacks, knapsacks, daypacks, fanny packs, messenger bags, shoulder bags, tote bags, duffel bags, overnight bags, athletic bags, carry-on bags and luggage, leather key chains, key cases, handbags, wallets, purses, coin purses, clutch purses, cosmetics cases sold empty, toiletry bags sold empty; pet accessories, namely, clothing for pets, collars for animals, covers for animals, leather leashes and dog collars | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Footwear, namely, shoes, slippers, boots, sandals, flip-flops, and athletic shoes; clothing, namely, shirts, tank tops, sweat pants, sweat suits, jeans, pants, shorts, overalls, jumpsuits, skirts, dresses, blouses, jackets, sweaters, vests, swimwear, bathing suits, cover-ups, sleepwear, pajamas, robes, nightgowns, leotards, lingerie, panties, bras, boxer shorts, underwear, scarves, belts, socks, stockings, tights, leggings, gloves; outerwear, namely, coats and raincoats; headgear, namely, hats, headbands, visors and bandanas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hotel California Baja LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hotel California Baja LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named HOTEL CALIFORNIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 8, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2013 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |