Drawing for BLACK VELVET

USPTO serial 85439433

BLACK VELVET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLACK VELVET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colleen Ferg Helmlinger

COLLEEN FERG HELMLINGER Seyfarth Shaw LLP233 South Wacker DriveSuite 8000Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer, ale and porterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 13, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 10, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance