USPTO serial 85440570
GOLD STANDARD MULTIMEDIA EDUCATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLD STANDARD MULTIMEDIA EDUCATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy D. Pecsenye
TIMOTHY D. PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLP1 LOGAN SQ FL 8PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | audio recordings and video recordings, including CDs, MP3s, DVDs, and CD-ROMs, featuring information and instruction used to prepare for entrance examinations for secondary school, college, and graduate and professional schools, and for standardized examinations; educational software featuring information and instruction used to prepare for entrance examinations for secondary school, college, and graduate and professional schools, and for standardized examinations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |