USPTO serial 85440957
HOT-CAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4211771Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2012
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOT-CAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
6000 Kuala Lumpur, MY
6000 Kuala Lumpur, MY
HOT-CAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SDN. BHD.
KUALA LUMPUR, MY
Other trademarks owned by HOT-CAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SDN. BHD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lance A. Foster
LANCE A. FOSTER JONES, WALKER, WAECHTER, POITEVENT, CARRERE & DENE8555 UNITED PLAZA BLVD FL 5BATON ROUGE, LA 70809-2260UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Self heating containers made primarily of metal for food | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 25, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |