USPTO serial 85441453
INSANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Trustee of the LEVIN FAMILY 2010 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA
Other trademarks owned by Trustee of the LEVIN FAMILY 2010 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST
Trustee of the LEVIN FAMILY 2010 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA
Other trademarks owned by Trustee of the LEVIN FAMILY 2010 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST
City of Industry, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | potato chips, partially water or steam blanched potatoes and partially fried potatoes; processed edible seeds; potato chips; processed fruit; and potato based snack foods, dried fruit; dried fruit mixes; processed nuts; processed nut mixes; trail mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; and snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits and processed nuts, vegetable based chips; fruit based chips, potato-based snack foods, namely, potato chips, potato puffs, potato sticks and potato fries; processed nutmeats; and snack mixes consisting primarily of processed nuts, raisins and/or processed fruit, potato chips, and processed nutmeats, shelled nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | seasoned puffed corn snacks; rice based snack foods; wheat based snack foods and various combination grain based snack foods, pretzels, crackers and mixes consisting primarily of pretzels and crackers, rice puffs, corn puffs, corn curls, corn chips, grain based chips, taco chips, tortilla chips; flour based chips, candy excluding mints and peppermints, frozen confections, popped popcorn, wheat chips, flour based snacks, namely, pita chips; confections, namely, caramel covered snack foods, namely caramel coated popcorn, caramel coated extruded corn snacks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trustee of the LEVIN FAMILY 2010 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by Trustee of the LEVIN FAMILY 2010 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by Snak-King Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named INSANE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |