USPTO serial 85441606
TEACH AWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TEACH AWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Recruitment of teachers and educational professionals for placement in teaching positions overseas | ACTIVE | Jan 4, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |