Drawing for FLO LIVING

USPTO serial 85441764

FLO LIVING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLO LIVING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catinca Tabacaru

PAULO A DE ALMEIDA PATEL & ALMEIDA PC16830 VENTURA BLVDSUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Powdered nutritional supplement drink mix and concentrateACTIVE—
029Protein based, nutrient-dense snack barsACTIVE—
030Granola-based snack barsACTIVE—
032Concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of sports and energy drinksACTIVE—
041Education services, namely, providing live and on-line programs, seminars, classes and courses in the field of health; Providing website featuring resources, namely, non-downloadable publications in the nature of books, brochures and manuals in the field of healthACTIVENov 1, 2010
044Providing resources in the field of health, namely, providing health informationACTIVENov 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 13, 2014TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jan 13, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 13, 2014OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 6, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 22, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 18, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance