Drawing for VENAPURE

USPTO serial 85442669

VENAPURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ARANT, LUCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENAPURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia M. Arko

Cynthia M. Arko EIP US LLP2468 Historic Decatur Road, Suite 130San Diego, CA 92106UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Elastic stockings for medical purposes, namely, anti-embolism stockingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 9, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 12, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 7, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 6, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 8, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 13, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 26, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance