Drawing for FRONTSIGHT

USPTO serial 85443052

FRONTSIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRONTSIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard S. MacMillan

RICHARD S. MACMILLAN MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODD, LLC720 WATER STTOLEDO, OH 43604-1883UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009obstacle sensing and detection systems comprised of transceivers, processors, and alarms sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 6, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 22, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 12, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 12, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 11, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 16, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance