USPTO serial 85443499
REAL VICE: MIAMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REAL VICE: MIAMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony V. Lupo
ANTHONY V. LUPO ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment and educational services in the nature of television and multimedia program series featuring subjects of general human interest distributed via various platforms across multiple forms of transmission media; providing entertainment information to others via a global computer network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2012 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |