USPTO serial 85443574
VOLT AUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOLT AUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis C. Lee
DENNIS C LEE KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP525 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60661-3629UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automotive electronics and electronic goods in the nature of car and home audio accessories, namely, speaker cables, power cables, electrical connectors, fuses, fuse holders, battery terminals, power distribution blocks, circuit breakers, noise filters, capacitors, resistors, switches, electric relays, battery terminal connector clamps, coaxial cables, installation kits comprised primarily of electrical connectors, stereo noise reducers | ABANDONED | Oct 18, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 9, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ZZBX | ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |