Drawing for CLOUDINGO

USPTO serial 85443743

CLOUDINGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOUDINGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Dietrich

WIILIAM H DIETRICH SLATER & MATSIL LLP17950 PRESTON ROADSUITE 1000DALLAS, TX 75252

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Cloud computing featuring software for use in customer relationship management (CRM) database management, deduplication, and data cleansingACTIVEAug 30, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 29, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 29, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 14, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 7, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 21, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 21, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 5, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 5, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2012GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2012GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2012EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Feb 10, 2012CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance