USPTO serial 85444440
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Calgary, Alberta, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Calculators; Computer software for the transmission of maps, directions and travel reservation information to mobile telephones; Fridge magnets; Mousepads | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Motor homes; Recreational vehicles, namely, campers; Trailers; Vans | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring recreational vehicles manufactured by others, namely, motor homes, vans, campers, truck campers | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and/or repair of recreational vehicles manufactured by others, namely, motor homes, vans, campers, truck campers | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Leasing of motor vehicles; Leasing of vehicles; Rental of motor homes; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and booking for temporary lodging; Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for restaurants and meals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |