Drawing for TETRA NAVIGATO

USPTO serial 85445056

TETRA NAVIGATO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TETRA NAVIGATO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adrienne L. White

ADRIENNE L. WHITE WRB-IP LLPPO BOX 476WADSWORTH, OH 44282-0476UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Building construction; factory construction; repair and maintenance of industrial food and liquid processing machines, industrial food and liquid package filling machines, and industrial food and liquid distribution machines and other machines used in the processing and packaging of food and liquid products; installation of industrial food and liquid processing machines, industrial food and liquid package filling machines, and industrial food and liquid distribution machines and other machines used in the processing and packaging of food and liquid productsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing training and instructional courses or classes concerning management, operation, maintenance and development in relation to packaging and processing industryACTIVE—
042Engineering; computer hardware and software consulting development of data processing programs; computer programming; support and consultation services for managing computer systems, databases and application; packaging design; professional consulting in relation to planning and development of factories; technical consultancy with regard to the planning and development of factories and dairies; scientific and technological research and development services, namely, scientific research and development, technological product research and development, all aforementioned services related to industrial food and liquid processing machines, industrial food and liquid package filling machines, and industrial food and liquid distribution machines and other machines in the processing and packaging of food and liquid productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 27, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 27, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 27, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 27, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 23, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2012CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 1, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2011AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 21, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance