Drawing for CORE TO CORPORATE

USPTO serial 85445245

CORE TO CORPORATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORE TO CORPORATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine H. Stockell

CATHERINE H. STOCKELL FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the mining, metal and minerals field for the data management, data storage, and simulation and modeling of mining processes, including performance monitoring, data reconciliation and associated data mining, not involving computer to computer softwareACTIVE—
037Technical consulting and information services in the mining extraction field and technical consulting and information services in the field of mining extraction of metals and mineralsACTIVE—
040Technical consulting and information services in the field of mineral processingACTIVE—
041Training services in the use of computer software and computer software systems, not involving computer to computer softwareACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the field of computer software for use in the mining, metal and minerals field; engineering, testing and analysis services in the field of mining, metal and mineral processing; technical consultation in the field of mining, metal and mineral processing plant engineering, namely, testing and evaluation of mining, metal and mineral processing plant equipment to improve performance and efficiency of such equipment;technical support services, namely, providing technical advice related to the installation, repair, and maintenance of software, and troubleshooting of software problems; updating of computer software for others; providing upgrades for computer software for others; application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications and software in the mining, metal, and minerals field; data mining; technical consulting and information services in the field of mining exploration; technical consulting and information services in the field of mining exploration of metals and minerals, not involving computer to computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 26, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 25, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2014ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 6, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 31, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance