Drawing for JUZO

USPTO serial 85446064

JUZO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUZO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James H. Walters

JAMES H. WALTERS PATENTTM.USPO BOX 82788PORTLAND, OR 97282-0788UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Energy drinks; Sports drinks; Sports drinks containing electrolytes; Sports drinks, namely, energy drinks; Coffee-flavored beverages, namely, espresso coffee-flavored beverage, namely, soft drink, Caramel coffee-flavored beverage, namely, soft drink, Cappuccino coffee-flavored beverage, namely, soft drink, Vanilla Bean coffee-flavored beverage, namely, soft drink; Nonalcoholic beverages with tea flavor; Soft drinks flavored with teaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 24, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 24, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance