Drawing for HOOTIFY

USPTO serial 85447539

HOOTIFY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOBO, DEBORAH E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOOTIFY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kit M. Stetina, Esq.

KIT M. STETINA, ESQ. STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, Internet monitoring for the purpose of providing content control of posted comments on third-party websitesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 19, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 23, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2012CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 2, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance