Drawing for MIRU

USPTO serial 85447566

MIRU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIRU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryan G. Pratt

Bryan G. Pratt Dorsey & Whitney LLP111 South Main Street, Suite 2100IP DepartmentSalt Lake City, UT 84111-2176

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Contact lens solutionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 29, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 28, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 28, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 29, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 1, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance