USPTO serial 85447968
VERICART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERICART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | biological implants, namely, a vital processed human or animal connective tissue in the nature of a double structured tissue scaffold to be implanted inter vivo and to encourage growth, and replacement of cartilaginous tissues, collagen, ligaments and tendons and epithelial tissues | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2014 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |