Drawing for ACTISHELL

USPTO serial 85448721

ACTISHELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTISHELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edwin S. Flores

EDWIN S. FLORES CHALKER FLORES, LLP14951 DALLAS PKWY STE 400DALLAS, TX 75254-6859UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics utilizing naturally derived and biological extractsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 28, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 5, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 5, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 11, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 16, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 20, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance