USPTO serial 85449260
LUXEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUXEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Friday Harbor, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Priya Sinha Cloutier
PRIYA SINHA CLOUTIER KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL1201 3RD AVE STE 2900SEATTLE, WA 98101-3028UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Freestanding thin films made primarily of metal for use as bandpass, pressure windows, photo cathodes, laser targets, and synchrotron targets for use in material, biology, engineering, methodology, physics and forensics;Crucibles of common metal and their alloys | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1973 |
| 009 | Laboratory equipment, namely, crucibles; Light Element X-ray, High Temperature Detector Windows; Light Element X-Ray Detector Windows | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1973 |
| 011 | Furnace/Heater, Furnace/heater power controller | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1973 |
| 017 | Freestanding thin films made primarily of polymers and also incorporating semiconductors, ceramics, and ionic compounds use as bandpass filters, pressure windows, photocathodes, laser targets, and synchrotron targets for use in material, biology, engineering, methodology, physics, and forensics | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1973 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Luxel Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named LUXEL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |