USPTO serial 85449846
NANOVACCINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NANOVACCINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry and science; reagents for research purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Chemical reagents for medical purposes, pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, in particular chemotherapeutics for the treatment of tumours, cardiac drugs and preparations for the treatment of asthma; receptor agonists and receptor antagonists; pharmaceutics for the treatment of neurological disorders for the treatment of infectious diseases; sanitary preparations for medical use; dietetic substances adapted for medical use, in particular substances for food supplements; all purpose disinfectants; fungicides; herbicides | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical and veterinary services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |