Drawing for CHIMELINE

USPTO serial 85450314

CHIMELINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIMELINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosemary S. Tarlton

ROSEMARY S. TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET ST FL 30SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software and computer application software for use in organizing and managing text messages, instant messages, microblogs, text, weblinks, images, audio and video content; downloadable software and computer application software for use in sending, receiving, posting, viewing, sorting and responding to text messages, instant messages, microblogs, text, images, audio and video content via the Internet and other communications networksACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to post information on a global computer network, namely, providing a website that enables users to organize and manage text messages, instant messages, microblogs, text, weblinks, images, audio and video contentACTIVE—
045On-line social networking services provided through a community websiteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance