USPTO serial 85451309
ENBRIDGE NORTHERN GATEWAY PIPELINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENBRIDGE NORTHERN GATEWAY PIPELINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle M. Marsh
MICHELLE M. MARSH Arent Fox LLP1675 BroadwayNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Newsletters and electronic newsletters; equipment, supplies and facilities for use in the transportation and storage of oil, natural gas liquids and petroleum products; equipment, supplies and facilitates related to marine terminals; informational programs, namely, maintaining a web site and maintaining a telephone call centre providing information relating to pipeline and marine terminal projects; facilitating community involvement in the regulatory review of pipeline and marine terminal projects; publishing newsletters and electronic newsletters; transportation and storage of oil, natural gas liquids, and petroleum products; marine services; construction of pipelines for the transportation of oil, natural gas liquids and petroleum products; operation and maintenance of pipelines transporting oil, natural gas liquids and petroleum products; construction of marine terminals; operation and maintenance of marine terminals; employment, training and education services in the fields of construction, operation, maintenance and management of pipelines and marine terminals; financial sponsorship of community projects and programs related to education, health and safety, culture and community leadership and the environment; operating a community investment fund to support community projects and programs related to education, health and safety, culture and community leadership and the environment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |