Drawing for SWIPEFORHUMANITY

USPTO serial 85451415

SWIPEFORHUMANITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LATTUCA, FRANK J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWIPEFORHUMANITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kit M. Stetina,

KIT M STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISESTE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036financial services, namely, electronic credit card transaction services, namely, initiating and supporting charitable contribution donation programs that allow the use of credit card for donations to the cause of others, all of the foregoing excluding offering of services to charities whose primary services or function is the renovation, repair, or construction of homes or residential buildingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 27, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 27, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 13, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 13, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 4, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 3, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 3, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 3, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2014TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 3, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 3, 2014OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 7, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 2, 2012OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 24, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance