USPTO serial 85452292
THINK NAKED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5148673Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2017
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THINK NAKED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dwayne K. Goetzel
DWAYNE K. GOETZEL MEYERTONS, HOOD, KIVLIN, KOWERT & GOETZEL, P.C.PO BOX 398AUSTIN, TX 78767-0398UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Track Fitness Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Track Fitness Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Track Fitness Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named THINK NAKED
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 28, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |