USPTO serial 85453263
TRINITY LOGISTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRINITY LOGISTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS PLLC625 SLATERS LANEFOURTH FLOORALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | full service logistics solutions, namely, freight logistic management, arranging the transportation of goods for others provided to clients after direct communication with the client, analysis of the client's logistics requirements, preparation of an individualized logistics plan for the client, and periodic review of the logistics plan to keep it optimized; transportation logistics services, namely, arranging the transportation of goods for others; engaging the needs of customers in a consultative ongoing partnership as their freight management vendor, namely, providing freight logistics management, arranging for pick-up, delivery, storage and transportation of documents, packages, freight and parcels via ground and air carriers after direct communication with the client, analysis of the client's logistics requirements, preparation of an individualized logistics plan for the client, and periodic review of the logistics plan to keep it optimized; freight logistics management for manufacturers, retailers, and wholesalers; and business management consultation in the field of transportation logistics provided by utilizing a transportation management system in order to assist clients with shipment planning, optimization, visibility of freight, and customized reporting after direct communication with the client, analysis of the client's logistics requirements, preparation of an individualized logistics plan for the client, and periodic review of the logistics plan to keep it optimized | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | supply chain logistics and reverse logistics services, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of documents, packages, raw materials, and other freight for others by air, rail, ship or truck both domestic and international provided to clients after direct communication with the client, analysis of the client's logistics requirements, preparation of an individualized logistics plan for the client, and periodic review of the logistics plan to keep it optimized; full service logistics solutions, namely, storage, transportation and delivery of goods for others by air, rail, ship or truck provided to clients after direct communication with the client, analysis of the client's logistics requirements, preparation of an individualized logistics plan for the client, and periodic review of the logistics plan to keep it optimized | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 27, 2014 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 13, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |