Drawing for MONKEYING AROUND

USPTO serial 85453274

MONKEYING AROUND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARADEWELAI, BENJI YUEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONKEYING AROUND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Broder

James P. Broder ROEDER & BRODER LLP4817 Biona Dr.SAN DIEGO, CA 92116United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the charitable services of others, namely, providing a website to provide individuals with information about various charities for the purpose of making donations to such charitiesACTIVE—
036Providing information about charitable fundraising, namely, providing individuals with the information to make monetary donations to their favorite charityACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing on-line training in the field of how to make donation to charities and philanthropic organizationsACTIVE—
042Charitable services, namely, providing a website that features technology that enables purchasers of products to choose to which charity from an established list of charities the purchasers wish to donate a portion of the sales proceeds of the productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 31, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 24, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 30, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 12, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 27, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 19, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance