Drawing for FIELDMASTER

USPTO serial 85453331

FIELDMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIELDMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald Spuhler

RONALD SPUHLER MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY LTD500 W MADISON ST34TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60661

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Apparel, namely, jackets, shirts, sportshirts, sweaters, vests, underwear, slacks, pants, shorts, tops, bottoms, jeans, coats, socks, gloves, belts, headwear and footwearACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 2, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 8, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 6, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 15, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 14, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 28, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
May 30, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 3, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 1, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 1, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 26, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 26, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 8, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 23, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 23, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Feb 7, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 27, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Oct 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 25, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance