USPTO serial 85455433
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, BC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberto Ledesma
Roberto Ledesma Lewis & Lin, LLC81 Prospect St., Suite 8001Brooklyn, NY 11201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, a software development platform and software tools for use in developing computer games, video games, creation and editing of graphics, motion graphics, film clips, photographs, special effects and composite images | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer software problems for computer game and video game software, and for software used in creation and editing of graphics, motion graphics, film clips, photographs, special effects and composite images; technical consultation services in the field of software development, namely, for computer game and video game software, and software for creation and editing of graphics, motion graphics, film clips, photographs, special effects and composite images | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |