Drawing for PLANNING FOR LIFE

USPTO serial 85455495

PLANNING FOR LIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YAO, GRETTA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PLANNING FOR LIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian M. Dingman

BRIAN M. DINGMAN MIRICK O'CONNELL DEMALLIE & LOUGEE LLP1800 W PARK DR STE 400WESTBOROUGH, MA 01581-3926UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial planningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance