USPTO serial 85456327
ROIDRIVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROIDRIVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB10TH FL666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable web-based application software and database management software for use in the fields of customer relationship management, business and sales processes, marketing and data integration, all for management of the automotive dealer and enterprise retail process; Downloadable web-based application software and database management software for automotive dealerships, OEMs and aftermarkets for use in management of local and enterprise functionality, visibility and reporting; Downloadable web-based application software and database management software for automotive OEMs for use in the fields of enterprise management, data consolidation and functional integration | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business enterprise management, data consolidation and functional integration of business processes providing solutions in the nature of leads management, contact consolidation, sales processes, marketing campaigns and customer lifecycle management; Consultation services in the field of automotive sales management, marketing management, customer relationship management, management of automotive dealership operations and process re-engineering and change management, namely, consulting in the fields of business processes and designing improved processes to reduce costs, increase efficiency and improve customer service | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software over the internet, intranet, local servers or private networks, for use by others, namely, automotive OEMs and dealers, for use in the field of sales and marketing, customer relationship management, and sales leads tracking management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring web-based application software and database management software for use in the fields of customer relationship management, business and sales processes, and marketing and data integration, which solutions integrate seamlessly with automotive dealer management systems and external databases, supporting and facilitating automotive dealerships and aftermarkets, local and enterprise functionality, visibility and reporting; providing on-line non-downloadable web-based application software and database management software for use in the fields of customer relationship management, business and sales processes, marketing and data integration, all for management of the automotive dealer and enterprise retail process; providing on-line non-downloadable web-based application software and database management software for automotive dealerships, OEMs and aftermarkets for use in management of local and enterprise functionality, visibility and reporting; providing on-line non-downloadable web-based application software and database management software for automotive OEMs for use in the fields of enterprise management, data consolidation and functional integration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2017 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |