Drawing for SEARA

USPTO serial 85457068

SEARA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEARA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine F. Hoffman

Catherine F. Hoffman Mayback & Hoffman, P.A.5722 So. Flamingo Road, #232Fort Lauderdale, FL 33330UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029FROZEN VEGETABLES AND FRUITS; READY-MADE ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY, OR VEGETABLES; MEAT-BASED PROCESSED PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FRANKFURTERS, BURGERS IN THE NATURE OF BEEF PATTIES, SAUSAGES, BOLOGNAS, PIECES OF MEAT, HAM, MEATBALLS AND COATED MEAT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SEASONED MEATS; POULTRY; PROCESSED LAMB; FISHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 19, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 2, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 1, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 28, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 27, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 29, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 24, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 2, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 3, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 31, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance