USPTO serial 85457260
HOTEL D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOTEL D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Clothing for domestic pets; Collars for pets; Collars for pets bearing medical information; Disposable pet diapers; Dog apparel; Dog clothing; Dog coats; Dog collars; Dog collars and leads; Dog leashes; Dog parkas; Dog shoes; Electronic pet collars; Garments for pets; Neckwear for dogs; Pet accessories, namely, canvas, vinyl and leather pouches for holding disposable bags to place pet waste in; Pet accessories, namely, specially designed canvas, vinyl or leather bags attached to animal leashes for holding small items such as keys, credit cards, money or disposable bags for disposing of pet waste; Pet clothing; Pet collar accessories, namely, bells, silencers, safety lights and blinkers, pendants and charms; Pet collar accessories, namely, bows and charms; Pet collar accessories, namely, charms; Pet hair ornaments; Pet products, namely, pet restraining devices consisting of leashes, collars, harnesses, restraining straps, and leashes with locking devices; Pet tags specially adapted for attaching to pet leashes or collars; Rawhide chews for dogs | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Beds for household pets; Dog beds; Dog kennels; Dog transport boxes; Non-metal dog tags; Pet crates; Pet cushions; Pet furniture; Pet ramp; Pillows for household pets; Portable beds for pets | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Clickers for training dogs; Dog toys; Pet toys; Pet toys made of rope; Toys for domestic pets | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Kennel services, namely, boarding for pets; Pet boarding services; Pet day care services; Pet hotel services | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Dog grooming services; Dog walking services; Kennel services, namely, dog breeding services; Pet care services, namely, administration of medication; Pet care services, namely, dog walking, dog bathing and non-medicated pet grooming; Pet care services, namely, dog walking, dog bathing, non-medicated pet grooming and in-home medical care; Pet grooming services; Providing on-line information via the Internet in the fields of animals and pets, relating to breeding, selection of the animals and pets, grooming, feeding and nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nancy Dennis
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named HOTEL D
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |