USPTO serial 85457266
A BETTER WAY TO WORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A BETTER WAY TO WORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rexford A. Johnson
REXFORD A. JOHNSON ZARIAN MIDGLEY & JOHNSON PLLC960 S BROADWAY AVE STE 250BOISE, ID 83706-3688UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Railroad equipment, namely, a hydraulic conversion kit for converting air-operated side-dumping railroad cars, and, conversion kits to convert manual ballast gates of a railroad ballast car into remote controlled ballast gates having the electrical system recharged by solar energy | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 037 | Railroad maintenance services, namely aggregate delivery services using a continuous belt and boom to offload the aggregate from the train, material handling services using an excavator and a series of endless gondola rail cars (without bulkheads), and, the unloading of ballast at desired locations along the bed of a railroad track using remote controlled gates on railroad ballast cars | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 042 | Railroad track inspection services, namely, a 3D scan of railroad ties yielding a condition assessment, and, an inspection of the ballast profile of a track bed using light detection and ranging technology, videography, and a wheel encoder | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Georgetown Rail Equipment Company
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named A BETTER WAY TO WORK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |